The article implies that in spite of poor performance reviews, the university did not take action until the photo containing criticism directed at the author of those reviews was discovered.
Assuming for a moment that this is the case, that should be troubling, in that it suggests a student with equally poor performance who was more vigilant about concealing their criticism or extracurricular activities would be given the green light. This would explain much about what is wrong with public education, and the great rewards reaped by the diligently dishonest, but it can hardly be called a positive thing.
That's why, even if this particular story is light on details that might clarify its importance, the subject itself is worth keeping an eye on. To ignore it may allow employers, educational institutions, and the government to move further into invasive and moralistic roles in our lives.