Rolex is very happy to use retailers to sell their watches, they're just not happy with retailers having the freedom to sell their watches as they deem appropriate.
It's basically retailer freedom to sell as they wish vs Rolex's freedom to prevent the retailer selling as it wishes, and I tend instinctively to support the little guy in these fights.
It can't be black and white and companies having no power to do so whatever the circumstances or contract.
I think we should be extremely sceptical of any definition of "freedom" that prioritizes the ability of big, wealthy companies to restrict the actions of smaller firms and individuals.
Not a thing in France.
Even if it was a case in the US, it is their resellers who are fighting the requirement of B&M-only sales. Not sure where that falls in the "first sale" doctrine because presumably there are contracts involved for resellers.
This case is not about owners selling their used watches on eBay or something.
There are probably ways to make it very onerous for partners to sell online though.