But then you don't get to editorialize before people start to read the article.

I'd never heard of it before clicking through.

Para... what?

Huh. Didn’t realise this was still legal anywhere.

"U.S. workers say banned weed killer in 50 countries is giving them Parkinson's" could be interpreted in several ways: that the weed killer is banned in 50 countries, or as "Banned weed killer giving US workers parkinson in 50 countries".

By moving banned, it makes it clear the weed killer is banned in 50 countries, not that it's killing people in 50 countries.