I didn’t “slap” any date on top of the article. 2 Oct 2023 is the date I published my article. (This is how blogs on the Internet work.)
The first line of the article says that this all happened in 2012. I’m not sure I could get any clearer there.
The “GPT distillation” phrase is pretty rude. Anyone reading the article can see the difference between it and the presentation. Every “hand-drawn” image in the article is created by me in Excalidraw, and any images from the presentation are sourced with a very clear link to the presentation.
If you have any constructive feedback, I am happy to listen and take it into account.
Otherwise, I’m not really a fan of the rudeness. Thanks.
I found it interesting and valuable. It doesn't matter if the base content originated from another source. I would never have seen that original content. I saw this. It's ok.