I’m going to say too. It’s exactly like people not being satisfied with one house they need two. That’s why I bought up the neoliberalism. Peoples lives are empty and doll and so they’re looking for more ways to excite themselves. In their lives are empty and because of neoliberalism.

> To me your comment is the outcome of smug, baseless superiority.

lol you’re on HN what do you expect?

None of them were happy, none of them had less problems only more. It’s a stupid idea that’s been trying to pass and never works. The reason I bought they were spiritual is because we talked a lot about selflessness. I am not spiritual I was just hanging out with these people. I’m assuming they were seeking spirituality to massage their guilt and hide their greed.

I’m saying this new popularity of polyamory is based on the liberalism because it’s the belief that you can have whatever you want and there’s no consequences for it. You end up, externalizing the pollution like all the corporations do.

Even calling it polyamory is idiotic because these people were just in mutual, romantic and sexual relationships, many of them had kids. There been any studies on what polyamory does to children.? One woman in the group even admitted she wasn’t telling her children. Is that healthy? A healthy thing is something you could tell your children.

To think that people can be in relationships and there be no jealousy and no problems or they can manage it somehow, and have everything they want is Ludacris and it’s never worked in the history of humanity.

I don’t care have sex with all the people you want, but just don’t try to rationalize it as some healthy lifestyle if one of the people in the relationship is in a long-term commitment with you.