Apple must license tens of thousands of patents for their products. What is so special about not paying for these? Is this dispute even about the patents at this point or just some kind of feud with Masimo?
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/masimo...
Masimo’s CEO claimed that they offered settling but that Apple didn’t even respond to that offer.
"The prosecutor offered you a plea deal, and you didn't entertain it at all. You must be guilty."
It may surprise you to learn that it's totally common to have patent settlement agreements where you retain your right to appeal, and only owe money if the appeal fails.
So they can in fact likely both get things back on the shelves, and still appeal.