I can't find the 92-page document, or a transcript of the court hearing. If he was unable to persuade a judge he wasn't wasn't aggressive and relentless, then I'd bet he was.
Yes, that's what groups campaigning on issues do, something we allow in democratic and free societies. Asking questions? How terrible!
Funny how a corporation can be relentless and aggressive in its expansion with no regard for other parts of society though.
I do realise that a judge is very likely unbiased, so maybe he was overstepping the mark, but I am also very sceptical about due process of this sort of stuff in the UK at the moment. I'm not native to the UK and I had a very high opinion of this country when I first arrived. But over the years I've watched our politics become so poisonous and incompetent that I now have a lot less faith in the UK systems.
> then I'd bet he was
I wish I could that confident on this as you are.
The confidence would be determined by the size of the bet. As I have no information, it wouldn't be a big bet.