As if the "minimalist editor" niche isn't already served with 1000 other apps? It's not exactly a niche the author uniquely identified and served.
It's one of the most crowded markets when it comes to offerings.
It's one of the most crowded markets when it comes to offerings.
If people find their app, like what they see, and are willing to pay the price, what is your objection exactly?
My more general objection to your question is that I don't consider individual preference, or individual choice, or individual action beyond criticism, just because the individual is "fine with it".
People can "find a product, like what they see, and be willing to pay the price", and the purchase could still be stupid and deserved to be called as such, and the price could still be highway robbery and be deserved to be called as such, and the product could still be subpar/average/bad and be deserved to be called as such.
I would have words for such viewpoints, but for the sake of a civilized conversation, I won't express them here.
Yes.
Do you think it's impossible for someone else to know better than the buyer if the latter got a good deal for a product at a given price?
If so, I have a bridge to sell you.
>I would have words for such viewpoints, but for the sake of a civilized conversation, I won't express them here.
Good for you. I have similar words for your viewpoint.
I do. Do you see me passing any laws or enforcing something to prevent it?
Am I allowed to criticize their decision though, or is that to much to ask?
>Nothing of what you wrote is a reason against the existence of more choices.
That's because writing against "the existence of more choices" wasn't my point. It was about criticizing stupid choices.