In some sense, they do that by moving the losses to before the battery/tank; so this isn't as big of a gain in terms of total energy usage. However, in terms of the effective capacity of the energy storage device, we don't really care about losses in refilling it.
We know the range estimates used to (?) be gamed[1], I don't see why this part wouldn't be, too.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/tesla-ba...
This is accurate to me within about 5% of the battery, even driving at fast highways speeds and in cold weather.
If it was "cheating" I think I'd notice an issue when the car said I had 5% left but the real battery charge was empty.
Think of the sat-nav range as closed-loop and the other testing based ranges as open-loop.
> Do we know it doesn't cheat?
Then the nav won't be accurate then would it? Also: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregory-pannone-3a414610/
The 57.5 kWh battery in the base Model 3 has the same energy content as just ~1.18 US gallons (4.46 liters) of pure gasoline. Electric motors are a lot more efficient than combustion engines, though.
Once you learn how to take the factors into account, you get a "feel" for what you can and cannot do.