> Daniel tiger jams in diversity at every opportunity.

It clearly doesn't given that Daniel Tiger's family, the primary family unit of the show, is a heterosexual couple.

> interracial

I guess I'm losing track of what we're supposed to be offended about now. OP suggested that depicting a heterosexual couple was “brave”, I pointed out that it happens all the time. Are we now arguing that there should be absolutely no instances of mixed-race, orientation or disabilities in kids shows at all?

Jack has ADD Chili's sister is infertile Winton, Judo, and the Terriers are from single parent households There's a deaf kid featured in Turtleboy There's a wheelchair kid in Quiet Game "Chocolate Milk" from Tradies is in a mixed breed relationship In fact, the whole fact that different breeds are interacting is an allegory for racial inclusion.

So yeah, Bluey gets a little "woke" here and there. Sorry, not sorry.

Chrissie is based on a character from the original Mr Rogers show.

You are trying to find things to be mad about, it seems.

"interracial household"? That's something you take issue with?

> Miscellena is from an interracial household

I’m so sorry you and your child had to witness that. Must have been quite traumatic.

So the argument is no longer that presenting an intact heterosexual nuclear family is worthy of positive note, but that instead presenting exclusively intact monoracial nuclear families is worthy of positive note?

With the former, I would agree, except that its so common that while it may be positive its hardly noteworthy; with the latter... just no.

> Owl doesn’t have a mother. Miscellena is from an interracial household. Crissy has a physical disability of some kind and cannot walk.

Oh man, god forbid a child being exposed to the vile, vile ideas of single parenthood, interracial love, or physical disability! How dare they, I say!

Sigh.