You teach morals to handle all situations.
You don't have to directly have brokenness, sex, rape, drugs, and murder in kids shows even if those things exist in the real world.
You don't have to directly have brokenness, sex, rape, drugs, and murder in kids shows even if those things exist in the real world.
Are you really trying to say that showing brown people and kids with a single parent is equivalent to showing rape and drug use?
Perhaps you should pause and reflect on your own morals if you think these are equivalent.
Second, my point was to show you that not everything in the real world needs to be depicted directly in kids shows. Not to make an equivalence of those listed things, but to test the consistency of the logic.
Learning morals you can learn how to handle those situations and ideals in the future without being introduced to inappropriate things too early in life.
Perhaps you shouldn't try to make an ad-hominem attack on my morals because you can't interpret it correctly. If you didn't understand, you could have asked for clarification.
That is to say, using same logic on "depicting brown people" and "depicting rape" is fundamentally flawed, it doesn't make sense to apply the same rules to "proximity to disabled people" and "murder" they aren't remotely in the same category. They are fundamentally different, and even if they were somehow similar enough to apply the same logic, they are not in any way similar in scope, its like claiming that showing a kid keeping a $100 bill they find on the street is somehow the same as showing a kid planning a multibillion dollar crypto heist... they involve different morals, different situations, and different consequences for every single person involved - that is they aren't the same.
Further, I never brought up someone being killed - that was a different person. You can tell because we have different usernames.