1. You posit a distorted idea of "tyranny" - you extend it to all morals
2. You assume a second stage of Satan Worship, which might not be present.
From the article it seems far more likely to be an Atheist club that chose a name to cause debate about the cultural capital religion has.
Bear in mind that for centuries the church has been used as a means of control and to support autocrats and persecution. It's far more likely the Satanic club is objecting to that use.
So far, the only instigators of conflict here seem to be religiously-involved adults. So long as individual self-expression is respected, I see no reason why Satan Club should be treated different from a religious fellowship or book club.
Seriously, take a look at what you wrote and think about the implications of painting people involved in Not Your Preferred Religion as "naive followers" with "amoral apathy" that are lured into "actual worship"... which sounds a lot like how certain popular religious organizations slip into the philosophies of others who were better off without them, not that I'd name names. It'd be difficult, anyway, as the hypocrisy is usually thick with individuals who engage in these sorts of mental gymnastics.
It's super common when TST gets involved, and it's always amusing to watch.