For example,
"While the court was in session, Germany has announced it will intervene in the substantial case to support Israel. They argue explicitly that, as the world’s greatest perpetrator of genocide, they are uniquely placed to judge. It is in effect a copyright claim. They are protecting Germany’s intellectual property in the art of genocide. Perhaps they might in future license genocide, or allow Israel to continue genocide on a franchise basis."
This does not appear meant to be funny, but just to unceasingly insult anyone he considers to be supportive of Israel in this case. The rest of the article is more of the same. And, for example, the South African complaint is clearly rushed and contains literal Hamas propaganda, which this author sees no problem with.