I did see a paper he wrote in 2020: https://davidgraeber.org/articles/the-museum-of-care-reimagi...
"Imagine that the experience of lockdown and economic collapse actually allows us to see the world as it really is and we acknowledge that what’s referred to as “an economy” is simply the way we collectively keep each other alive, provision each other with the things we need and generally take care of one another. Say we also reject the notion of social control."
Basically, “look Randy, it’s not illegal to scream racial slurs here on this public sidewalk, and the state doesn’t have the right to stop you, but you’re being an asshole and you should shut up.” We should all aspire to do the right thing, but not everyone is going to. I imagine 10-20% of any group is filled with jackasses, so trying to build society around those people neglects the other 80-90%.
This is like writing a physics paper that starts with "assume humans could jump to the moon" or an international relations paper with "say we could all just get along". You can write anything you want if you start off with assumptions like that.
The only bit of evidence from Graeber apart from the linked paper was that he did go on vacation in 2020 around the time when many people might not have left their house, and when many people were forced by the state not to travel. This was of course before the vaccination issue. The paper seemed to indicate he viewed it as temporary and one that would provide lessons to people. Do anarchists hold the latter view now? What are these lessons? Is there reflection on the range of views and any conflicts it showed?
I find the range of responses given at the time when it was going on interesting and reflect the conflict between collective responsibility and freedom.