Can't that 51% of shareholders vote on a new board and CEO if the existing ones refuse demands?
Of course, even with the high costs, there are notable successes, such as Exxon having a quarter of their board replaced in 2021. And union organising is not mutually exclusive, in fact, Starbucks unions are seeking three seats on the board this year. But they're notable because of how rare they are, and the difficulties will mean that it's likely to remain relatively rare.
On the other hand, having the precedent set that it's even at all possible does probably make it more likely for directors to acquiesce to even non-binding resolutions.
[1]: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/05/25/the-cost-of-proxy...
[2]: https://www.kirkland.com/publications/kirkland-manda-update/...