[flagged]
Are you defending the non-consensual deepfake porn and people who want to seek it out? If so, that's a reason for me to leave HN and let others know that's what the official stance is.
Your comment would suggest any use of imagination to make a thing that doesn't get written approval by all parties even thought of is also a consent issue: if you fantasize about a crush you are violating them, and any type of parody whatsoever is too.
>Sit this one out. It's not a discussion for you.
While being incredibly condescending, you neglected to ask for consent to think about this person's ability to participate in the conversation, maybe this isn't a discussion for you either.
Revenge porn is bad. Imaginary revenge porn is just as bad.
People in popular culture have been used by artists to their liking since the beginning of art. Don't compare this to someone posting naked pictures of an ex who has a completely private life and doesn't spend their entire being trying to be in front of every camera possible, usually in outfits that make it quite easy for the imagination to extrapolate into the pornographic.
So other commenters have a direction to debate you in.
My response, to both: good luck putting this cat back in the bag.
Whatever harm these people are doing, they'll continue to do it "in private"; be aware of the "new normal" and adjust accordingly seems like the only pragmatic approach.
It's literally just art in bad taste.
That's not a new experience for most people on the Internet.
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/generative-ai-images-child-s...
So is this "literally just art in bad taste"?
If you're only here to pontificate, not curiously discuss your position, you're gonna have a bad time.
Seems you've made it art, even if it wasn't before.
It’s could be a desire to check whether this is intrusive or an IP issue.
No one consents to capitalism or other norms of their culture (born into it)
We can come up with philosophical ideals but they’re meaningless given reality
We all see how society treats each other and yet we keep giving in to reproductive urges
Our animalistic nature is a fractal in that it’s always there, has been since humans came about, will be as long as they exist
Words associations, technology change fast. Meat suits change slow.
Usually you don’t see it but when you aren’t looking it still exists.