I would say "Simple solution: abolish patents on software".
More often a patent or copyright is one of thousands a giant company procures. But all the intellectual property profiteers need is that 1 in 300,000,000 chance dangling in front of a voter and they'll never agree to do away with IP, in fact, the opposite will happen. They'll actively fight to keep them in place.
(That's not to say that the reality isn't also broken, just that popular perception is even more broken.)
What a silly point then. Who cares what people's perceptions are when they are not based in reality.
> If your "maybe someday" dream prominently features being issued a patent, it's not because you'll use the patent responsibily to defend the idea that you're actively developing and marketing.
I see, so nobody can get a patent because nobody will use a patent "responsibly".
There's no point in furthering this conversation.
I'd love to be proven wrong, but I think the "well if you wanna make an omelet..." kind of attitude I usually see accompany sentiments like this seem more edge-lordy than anything else.
>into complex chip design
Do you have any idea all the technology and tools that go into chip design? They aren't all nicely documented in some patent applications.
>when your competitor could just pay your lead engineer half of your 9 figure R&D budget to completely replicate the process
Good luck with that. No single engineer knows enough to replicate any truly complex process.
>I'd love if this work could be done by universities or publicly funded because it so obviously benefits the greater good
If you could pay a single engineer to do anything so substantial as you claim, then all this work would be done by universities. It isn't, for a reason.
The incentive that companies have to pour resources into this stuff is to make money, and they do this by building their technology base and market share. Not having patents isn't going to make much difference; it'll just prevent them from keeping new competitors out of the market so easily.
In fact, I would say the ultimate realization of that is the existence of patent-trolls. The patent-holder which exists solely for the purpose of possessing the patent rather than creating it, or utilizing it to make their own product.
But how?
Oh, I would immediately start a fund that looks for good ideas at the germinating phase and then superfunds a competitor.