Fans of Asimov's _Foundation_ series will appreciate the analogue to how this system aims to predict every eventuality based on every possible combination of events, a la psychohistory.
P.S. amazing intro post. Can't wait to try the product.
Fans of Asimov's _Foundation_ series will appreciate the analogue to how this system aims to predict every eventuality based on every possible combination of events, a la psychohistory.
P.S. amazing intro post. Can't wait to try the product.
For a software not interacting with the real world, there is only one possibility for frame N+1, if you know the state of a system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism
PRNG are illusions, just misunderstood by humans.
Of course, to argue against myself, it would surely be based on layers of probabilities, and they say several times in the series that it can't predict low-level specific things, just high-level things. And perhaps the whole underlying question posed by the series is whether the universe really is deterministic. But anyway I don't think it's all off-base.
(if you know the state of a system + all the rules then you can know the next state)
and determinism actually applies way beyond just algorithms.