These comments appear to be about Gemini's image generation, IIUC. Gemma, however, is a language model -- whilst I believe that a larger unreleased version of it is used as part of the Gemini product, it doesn't seem relevant to these criticisms. Also, the Gemma base model is released, which doesn't AFAIK contain any RLHF.

The impression I have is that you're using the release of Gemma to complain about tangentially related issues about Google and politics more generally. The HN guidelines warn against this: "Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents... Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something. Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle."

It looks like you're trying to get some sort of "confession" from relevant people based on recent memes against the company? The reality is likely that the developers sincerely believe in the value of this product and are proud of its launch. You're just adding uninteresting, irrelevant noise to the discussion and you probably won't get what you want.

Neither of those applies at all to Gemma, though? I'm still confused -- what are you trying to accomplish with this line of questioning?