Hacker News Reader

Comment by vidarh | Hacker News Reader

My employer's IT is in a different country. I'm not sure which. If it matters, that's an organizational problem, not a WFH problem.

View on HN

At the rate things are currently changing, I won't be very surprised if non-trivial server capacity gets located in orbit thanks to some successor to Starlink.

This will make remote work mandatory, even if it still can't fix all the possible issues.

Why would that make remote work any more mandatory than it is with 'the cloud' or data centres?

Going to space to fix them is very hard.

(Only due to your comment did I realise I was ambiguous, I meant remote work specifically for the IT department would be mandatory, not everyone in general).

It could still be office-based though, sure technically remote from the server, but so are the web servers software engineers develop for typically, sometimes even their development environment is. I don't think that really factors into remote (WFH) vs office working at all, at least from an employer's perspective. Maybe it makes it easier to work remotely, but certainly doesn't necessitate it: you can work from anywhere, and that can still be the office.

Your worklocation is mir and it's you that goes remote, you don't go remoting. Just like a drill rig. ;)

But only mandatory in the sense of distance to the equipment - it still won't stop some managers from wanting them all corraled into an office somewhere.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com