I'm not going to defend a murderer who's already been convicted and sentenced, but if you do a little more digging for a site that's more reputable than the New York Post, you'll find that this guy 1) entered a plea deal; 2) supposedly killed his wife in a fit of passion due to her robbing him and having an affair; and 3) was interestingly sentenced by an all-woman jury who one would expect to be less forgiving when sentencing someone who killed his wife. Obviously we can both agree that he should be in prison for longer than 10 years, but alas, he was judged by a jury of his peers and that's what they decided justice looked like in this case.

But anyway, it's not like I wasn't saying people don't get sentenced to 10 years for murder, so don't act like you got me in some kind of internet gotcha. I wanted to know what nuance – i.e. plea deals, details of the crime – you had left out, because you were trying to conflate the sentencing of some guy trafficking wildlife with the sentencing of murderers, as if either of these things has any bearing on or relevance to the other.

Lmfao.