Most of these make sense in isolation, but if you apply this thinking to everything it quickly adds up. I’m not keen on spending $3k-4k per year on software alone. Even if it provided massive productivity gains (hasn’t for me) my pay would not increase accordingly.
sleep: bed, mattress, pillow, sheets ... etc
workout: gym membership, bike, ... etc
food: organic, heirloom, natural ... etc
I'd claim that this is a logic that comes from rich, first world countries where you don't need to prioritize things in life much, as you can mostly afford everything. Poor people have to think thoroughly about everything they spend money on.
It’s worth $6000 for the XDR Pro Display
Heh, that little? If you're using any Autodesk stuff that's most of your budget at once.
of course, you need to be an owner that can get the benefits of the increased productivity. if you're salaried, may not make sense.
May I suggest learning enough Linux to remove the impedance mismatch between your dev and prod machines?