> Over time there is quite a large accumulation of hackers looking at the most mundane technical details.
Are there though? Even if true, there are probably enough places with very few eyes on them.
Are there though? Even if true, there are probably enough places with very few eyes on them.
A kind of online-tool that collects the sources to build some relevant distributions, a web front-end to show a random piece of code (filtered by language, probability to show inreasing by less-recently/frequently/qualified viewed) to a volunteering visitor to review. The reviewer leaves a self assesment about their own skills (feed back into selection probability) and any potential findings. Tool-staff double-checks findings (so that the tool does not create too much noise) and forwards to the original authors (bugs) or elsewhere (backdoors).
A bit like wikipedias show random page.