A medical device should not require a subscription
The problem in this case seems to be that the device requires a prescription in the first place. But since it does, I don’t see an issue with enforcing it.
There's no reason why a treatment that is working and is expected to continue to be effective indefinitely should be withheld because a doctor's appointment didn't happen during the scheduled window one month, any more than my glasses should stop working because I didn't see my opthalmologist this year.
Freedom to choose suboptimal outcomes is not a bad thing.
Noone really does