Is your concrete proposal that data should only be allowed to be collected and shared by people with a specific agenda to push?

Science and research are funded in phases. So greater awareness and understanding of a particular problem can often fund the research towards finding solutions. I hear your frustration that there aren't proposed solutions here but I don't think that's the point of this--awareness is.

I do know some teachers who work with very high risk kids. I can imagine some of these findings presented in an appeal to get more funding for their work as they are horribly under resourced to meet the need.

In before this gets flagged /massively downvoted.

If you don’t explain your intentions it comes off as brainwashing the viewer. Because otherwise they’re just mindlessly taking in whatever you’re telling them.

So what are we supposed to take from this?

Parenting approaches vary in nature and culture. Some feature high parental involvement and long childhoods, while others have very short childhoods, or none at all.

These are evolutionary advantages and disadvantages to both strategies. In a highly stressed environment individuals who are less dependent on parental protection will be more likely to survive. The advantage of long childhoods and high parental involvement is that the individual will evolve sophisticated behaviors.

To simply assume everyone is exactly the same at birth and modified by society to an outcome is a vast simplification that requires substantial scientific justification, you cannot just assume it given the variations of parenting we see in nature.

Some of your proposals sound bigoted. Open the borders. A family is, of course, a group of people who say they are a family. It need not be permanent, they might not have been a family last week, nor will they necessarily be a family next year. It's all very fluid and progressive. We wouldn't want to discourage the idea that there can be serial divorce and remarriage, picking up new step-siblings along the way.

What's your concrete proposal? Restrict the web to material featuring a concrete proposals? Establish concentration camps to re-educate those who would publish material lacking in concrete proposals?

(Am I missing the irony or something?)