Do we? To what threshold? Sustainably?
We don’t have, for example, have the resources to provide every person on the planet with the quality of life of even a lower-quintile American. (Home, power, plumbing, car, petrol, varied industrially-produced foods, television, phone, internet, in-person education, security, et cetera.)
Also, you leave basic security out of your list: not having roving gangs for example always stealing your stuff and sexually harassing your daughter. That's more important that having lighting after dark.
I don't like that way of framing it. I prefer to say that the US would need to spend additional resources (which seem prohibitive to me) to ensure that the nominal resources reach the intended recipients.
It's not a resource issue, but it's not an external factor either.
And we have no evidence thus far that human desires can be saturated.
We more than definitely have enough resources to satisfy everyone's basic needs. The basic needs would be: clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, simple healthy food, a safe home and community, quality education and healthcare, and the freedom to do whatever it is you want to do as long as it doesn't impinge on these basic needs of anyone else.
I read that as giving everyone weapons and was surprised at the tone shift.