>cultural norms of "logic", etc
Your brain on logical relativism, I guess.
Less snarkily: the 1/2/3 watches example is a single, ~deterministic, ~knowable data point; it is roughly the simplest type of problem space you can deal with, and even here there is uncertainty. Now consider a much more complex problem space, reality (better known as "the reality"), and things get much worse. But paradoxically, with all the added complexity, "correct" answers often become simpler, not more difficult. (Here I am referring to the conversations you may find on social media (or anywhere) about complex matters such as war.)
[1] Having fun, fitting in, just joking, etc.
Why? It's neither the subject at hand nor have you expressed it meaningfully. I dismissed you because I'm optimizing for productive concrete discussion in the face of your social gaming, and you argued against me on the same grounds only because you lack the self-awareness to see that. Assuming conclusively someone is necessarily incorrect only because they were snarky when they ignored you is not an optimum strategy.
Can be good practice to avoid making the classic errors you just made.
Sorry if it sounded like an order, I meant it more as a suggestion.
Why do You People do this? Why do you not behave more logically?
This conversation is like pulling teeth. Fix this or I'm done wasting my time.
Are you engaging in rhetoric, or are you actually serious?
Where is that quote from by the way?