> H&R block, if any, will allocate more to share buy backs
Okay, but then whomever owned the share previously and accepted the profit in exchange for giving the share back now holds the profit instead. What are they going to do with it?
Okay, but then whomever owned the share previously and accepted the profit in exchange for giving the share back now holds the profit instead. What are they going to do with it?
Or just build their 6th mansion that uses a plot of land that could fit 400 apartments, keeping the people underneath them commuting 1 hour from their 80 square meter apartment.
But then the profit is given to whomever previously owned the property. What are they going to do with it?
> Or just build their 6th mansion
That puts people to work, violating the premise here.
That's why we are here, but, frankly, I'll take ill-informed speculation over whatever the hell this is. What on earth is the point of using a discussion forum if you are going to outsource the useful words to other people? If they wanted to contribute to the discussion, they would do so themselves.
In fairness, perhaps you accidentally hit submit before you were finished?
Which, again, merely trades the profit to whomever previously owned the homes. What are they going to do with the profit?