That's a lot of pedantry you've got there for someone who claims it is not welcome. Rules for thee, not for me?

But, if you'd kindly come back to the topic at hand:

> That is what the discussion here is about - the way errors are handled in a language in practice, not in theory.

While I'm not entirely convinced that is accurate, I will accept it. Now, how does:

- "That said, suggesting adding exceptions to Go is about as reasonable as adding a GC to Zig."

Relate to that assertion? What does "suggesting adding exceptions to Go" have to do with a common pattern that has emerged?