> seems only good at enabling generative spam and disinformation
This doesn't seem to make sense. Although it uses the word "disinformation", so perhaps an LLM wrote it.
This doesn't seem to make sense. Although it uses the word "disinformation", so perhaps an LLM wrote it.
LLMs aren't intelligent and the hallucinations problem is fundamental to the technology, and cannot be solved.
Therefore definitionally an LLM will never be fully trustworthy.
But it's great at generating plausible-sounding stuff, which makes it great for propaganda and disinformation.
Saying LLMs are not useful for anything but generating spam is objectively wrong, as to disqualify your commenta from serious discussion about the topic.
There are many issues with GenAI that are worth discussing, saying they are generally useless is not the way.
That you said it was only good for those things. You changed it in this message, as I'm sure you're aware.