Hacker News Reader

Obviously the article leave a lot of the science out, but this sounds like it’d be an easy thing to test for (which they’ve now done). Why wouldn’t this have been done years ago - I’m not trying g to say they should have done it earlier, as I genuinely don’t know. Is the tech to check this new? How much other science has been based off of this theory in the meantime?

View on HN

Did they test it succesfully? Did they make some blunder? Did they misrepresented the importance of their results? Will it replicate? Does it apply to humans?

I wouldn't be bothered with putting much faith on any of the papers coming out, unless I was a researcher in that space. The dust is far from settled.

Oh me neither, I’m less interested in the results and more that (to someone who has no idea behind the science - me), I’m surprised to hear it’s just now only being tested when I’ve heard this was the main theory of sleep for years.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com