Ditto Business Insider, Politico as well.
I see stories which either deliberately ignore fundamental and simple military or situational knowledge, in order to present a theme of failure or hopelessness.
Example : the recent stories about "UA had nothing to stop the Russians when they came over the border".
You have a pick/scout line thrown out at the border, not your main forces, and any initial attack has overwhelming strength and you trade space for defence, wearing the attacker down and drawing them out of their established support "bubble" which extends up to and somewhat over their current lines (drones, arty, EW, etc).
Fundamental lack of basic military knowledge - idiotic reporting - or deliberately presenting a negative narrative, which is fundamentally and profoundly invalid and ignores reality and correctness, for whatever reasons.