Hacker News Reader

Comment by kqr | Hacker News Reader

Yup. Similarly, if staplers and scissors always disappear from office cabinets, it's often because people know they disappear so they hold onto them to have them available. It's a self-reinforcing system.

But if one buys a bunch of them, people start trusting that they will be available, and will hoard less!

View on HN

I thought the solution to the tragedy of the commons was institutions: we need a 1000-year old socially-enforced tradition of shunning hoarders and assigning dishwasher duty.

Your solution sounds easier, though.

In a closed system, you could grow the commons until there's no scarcity anymore, and thus no tragedy either. This stops working once some "entrepreneur" figures your commons is their arbitrage opportunity, and opens the system to the outside world.

Ooh, you could start "forkr.com", a just-in-time peer-to-peer fork leasing service!

I'm taking this disgusting train to it's logical conclusion. Seeking VC to start my "mouthsharing" company, where you can hire someone to pre-chew your food up for you, like a baby bird.

You're forgetting an NFT for all my finance bro friends to pump and dump

See, I like the peer-to-peer idea, but if you're going to be centralized anyway (via the service), why not have your own sourcing resources as well? Team up with waymo or whatever self-driving taxi services are around, rent out a small chunk of the trunk to store a good selection of cutlery and consumables (teabags, salt and pepper, sriracha packets, etc. etc.).

> In a closed system, you could grow the commons until there's no scarcity anymore

I don't know what your definition of "closed system" is, but I can assure you the only way the dining hall gets more forks is if they enter the system from outside. Unless it's a dining hall at a fork factory :)

It works if you can afford it, and avoid a runaway moral hazard. Pretty soon you will have tractor trailers filling up with staplers

Reply on news.ycombinator.com