What about small publishers?
Can they change their license to fight back the AI data gobblers? A watermark is easy to implement and prove if your content gets picked up in the next training set. Or is this something that is not possible?
Can they change their license to fight back the AI data gobblers? A watermark is easy to implement and prove if your content gets picked up in the next training set. Or is this something that is not possible?
Is it? How would you watermark raw text? Images maybe, but I'm skeptical even there.
My high-school cousins tell me kids use one AI to write these days, and another to rewrite it to avoid AI detectors. I view fighting against this as a Sisyphean task.
However, if it does get picked up then the watermark can be something as simple as a fake concept. For example, “Who is the Siberian Spectral Parrot?” - you can even present this as an alter-ego or something, so you don’t need to hide it from your users. Creativity is really the limit here.
And I think there has been evidence that ChatGPT had picked up small things like Reddit usernames.
But I am open to walking my statement back on it being easy. Maybe you do need a lot more references for some information to be included.
It’s also possible you thought I meant watermarking every content piece. I am talking about a site-wide content license.
We're building for publishers of all sizes! We turn your proprietary data into an AI-ready data model, and let you control the license by pricing on our marketplace.
We connect data to AI at the content access level - instead of training an AI on your data, we let an AI agent connect to your data model, and ensure you get paid every time an AI generates a response using your content.
We're building a self-serve platform for licensing publisher data for AI usage & access on dappier.com.
If you have an RSS feed, it only takes 1 click to transform your data into an AI-ready data model & set your own price point. We'll be onboarding other methods of syncing data soon!