Why is the answer probably no?
I think it's an interesting opportunity to see things I don't normally get to see. And I'm privileged enough that this isn't the end of my lifestyle with the increased cost that will occur.
So why not?
I think it's an interesting opportunity to see things I don't normally get to see. And I'm privileged enough that this isn't the end of my lifestyle with the increased cost that will occur.
So why not?
2. There is a finite amount of money and there are things more important than tv. Maybe curing cancer? Subsidizing childcare? Dunno two easy ones off the top of my head
Local news is important.
>things more important than tv. Maybe curing cancer?
This is a fallacy. The people making local news shows aren't the same people that are curing cancer, and the people curing cancer aren't going to stop to go make local news shows because of this.