Putting aside personal convenience is fundamental to loving God and neighbor at times.
No, it's fundamental to character. It's not exclusive to religion. That's just part of the myth.
Mixed fibers, prohibitions against eating pork, tattoos, fully submissive women, uncovered heads, slavery, divorce, etc
Some people actually do attempt to follow some of these things, but there's even contradictory information in the same book!
Someone could come up with a definition for each that excludes this need, but that is true of character and any subjective definition.
I realize to not do so in general makes society a pretty awful place, but most religions say you’ll go to hell if you don’t.
It’s the Supreme Court’s job to explicitly follow the constitution. In your example I want them to be religious fundamentalists. If that turns out to be an issue we have a body that can change our society’s “bible.”