> AI images are often at least as relevant as a stock photo
That's damning with faint praise, as stock photos are rarely very relevant or add to the writing they're tacked onto.
That's damning with faint praise, as stock photos are rarely very relevant or add to the writing they're tacked onto.
I'm especially confused about this for feature images, because I would expect in most cases any helpful image (like a graph or diagram) would make for a really unattractive or incomprehensible thumbnail, and thumbnails are where featured images get the most exposure (social media previews etc).