Define "luck". That's what this whole disagreement hinges on. You're using a different definition of luck.
Sure, I reap the fruits of my past decisions, like the shed. More to the point, I reap the fruits of my parents' decisions. Is that luck?
It's not luck from the perspective of actions having consequences, and parents doing things that help their children.
It is luck from the perspective of "you didn't pick your parents", or from the "if you were going to be born to someone random, where and when would you want to be born?" perspective.
So you and abenga are saying "yes it is!" "no it's not" about the same set of facts, because you're running different definitions of what is or is not luck.
Arguments about the definitions of words are really uninteresting. What you and abenga are saying boils down to "yes, actions have consequences, and better actions lead to better consequences, both for yourself and your descendents, but no, you didn't select the parents, country, or time you were born to".
Apart from the definition of "luck", do either of you actually disagree with either side of that? If so, with what part, and why?
And, if you do agree with it, what conclusions do you draw?