This is like saying any python program is open source because the python runtime is open source.
Inference code is the runtime; the code that runs the model. Not the model itself.
Inference code is the runtime; the code that runs the model. Not the model itself.
You can use that model with open data to train it from scratch yourself. Or you can load Meta’s open weights and have a working LLM.
That said the LLama-license doesn't meet strict definitions of OS, and I bet they have internal tooling for datacenter-scale training that's not represented here.
That makes it source available ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software ), not open source
No, it doesn't mean that. To quote the page I linked, emphasis mine,
> Source-available software is software released through a source code distribution model that includes arrangements where the source can be viewed, and in some cases modified, but without necessarily meeting the criteria to be called open-source. The licenses associated with the offerings range from allowing code to be viewed for reference to allowing code to be modified and redistributed for both commercial and non-commercial purposes.
> This is kinda the opposite, you can modify the model, but you don't see all the details of its creation.
Per https://github.com/meta-llama/llama3/blob/main/LICENSE there's also a laundry list of ways you're not allowed to use it, including restrictions on commercial use. So not Open Source.