For me too, I can see how ONE person would be psycho/sexually charged by starting fires.
But a couple in a stable relationship? How does that conversation start? Did they meet at a climate denial convention for radicals?
But a couple in a stable relationship? How does that conversation start? Did they meet at a climate denial convention for radicals?
Having been around far left activist groups in my past, there are many who think that doing things like this on purpose is morally justified, because it keeps the conversation on climate change. The media incentivizes it by covering them as "climate-fueled wildfire" stories, every single time.
Wildfires in Canada were at a two-decade low in 2020, during the lockdowns. Think about that.
Likely because most wildfires are accidents, even with accelerationist provocateurs being profoundly stupid and causing the thing they're worried about to get you to worry about it. People radicalized enough to do that are wildly uncommon.
Never underestimate a radicalized idiot... they are capable of the inconceivable.
Without more data, just criminals. Activists would behave differently IMO.
Why would you automatically assume this? The world has had pyromaniacs long before it was fashionable to make radical climate activism one's identity.
I think it’s that couples can either average out a bit (destructive interference?) or ramp each other up to an insane degree (constructive interference).
Usually it’s a mix across attributes, so nothing too notable occurs. But obviously not in this case…
In Mossad together?