[flagged]
Why don't you trust the output of the voting machines in this case, but do trust it in the prior case?
In both cases, there are reports of numerical anomalies that are claimed to be statistically unlikely. One elicits calls for validation, the other elicits claims of "election denialism" for similar requests. Strange.
In this case, I believe the claim is that the reported numbers don't even match what the machines printed out.
There's a lot of room for distinguishing these, even through the fog of uncertainty in any developing story.