It sounds like an independent third party needs to review what happened.
Entropic appears to pulling at some emotional response with their initial introduction in regards to LBGTQ, etc. That’s irrelevant information.
What is your source for this?
But it appears they waited until the end.
Contractual terms and timeline should have been better. Starting this in January was probably too late. Badge issues have been common in past years.
It is quite common for a big entity to act shitty towards smaller makers. So *if* this is the case, DEFCON are the bad guys, no matter how common it is.
Citation needed. I have never heard this