"Systems are not affected if IPv6 is disabled on the target machine."
And adoption seems to be at 45%[0].
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-serve...
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/core-infrastructure-a...
Actually, I was planning to switch off IPv4 but some SMTP servers are still IPv4 only and few other services (msft github for instance).
I tried 464XLAT on my home network, for the most part it worked flawlessy, aside from some IoT devices that don’t support v6 at all or are not LAT aware. So dual stack it is.
Ofc, it depends on your usage.
But what's very surprising are those Big Tech sites, with billions of $ and still IPv4 only, like msft github (and github has still its core functions working with noscript/basic (x)html browsers).
What is really bothering me is the admin of the mail server of my medical insurance company: IPv4... but that's not what is the most annoying, the most annoying: it is not white listing its client SMTP servers/client emails... this is another level of bad.
Anyway, question is.. If this is mitigated by disabling IPv6 it means its IPv6 stack only issue exploit? IPv4 is safe?