Hacker News Reader

I feel like you missed the point of the article. As this

> The output of df and mount shows the truth as it is: raw and shitty.

Is pretty much the point they are making about Trainwreck Design. They are using their output of df as a talking point to illustrate the issue.

Maybe. But they explicitly mention: “this results in programs like df. or mount.”

If you want to call out design shit then just call it what it is: systemd. Leave df out of it, the poor fellow. Mount also has nothing to do with it.

Well, someone needs to stand up for those poor applications, might as well be you ;)

I still think it means you are missing the overall point of the author thoughts by focussing so heavily on them using df as an example.