Comment by troupo | Hacker News Reader

Comment by troupo | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

> It's one command that implements

And you know this command how? You discovered it how?

> That's my entire point! I learned the majority of Emacs and Vim commands well back in the mid-90s.

Indeed. And now you complain about friction in IDEs because you refuse to learn IDEs to the same extent.

> My point was about little frictions all adding up.

Yes, yes they do. And I find there are significantly more frictions in Emacs and Vim than in a modern IDE. The only reason you don't see them is that you've already learned Emacs/Vim

> It just takes much less memory to remember 4 verbs and maybe 6 nouns in Vim to perform navigation, than learning 4x6=24 shortcuts

Wat. I don't even know what these random numbers mean, and where you got them from. And how we went from functionality and capabilities to navigation.

> I'm just explaining why needing to remember fewer things

Thing is, you don't remember "fewer things" with Emacs/Vim. You end up remembering about the same, or greater number of things on top of significantly worse functionality.

Like you pretend that remembering dozens of various commands to type into `M-x` is somehow easier, and requires less memory than remembering the common shortcuts for common actions and falling back to Cmd+P(VS Code)/Cmd+Shift+A(Intelli J) to look up actions you rarely use.

Why the antagonism? Programmable editors don't work for you, fine.

Why make personal attacks on me, like this:

> you pretend that

I'm not pretending anything.

> Thing is, you don't remember "fewer things" with Emacs/Vim. You end up remembering about the same, or greater number of things

Not true. Like I said, I use an IDE daily, and there's much more to remember to get the same functionality that I get out of (for example) Vim. It's easier for me to remember (for example) 10 nouns that can be combined with 10 verbs than to memorise 100 shortcuts.

You may find it easier to memorise 100 shortcuts rather than 10 verbs and 10 nouns, but I am certainly not pretending when I tell you that I find it easier to remember 20 things rather than 100 things.

> It's easier for me to remember (for example) 10 nouns that can be combined with 10 verbs than to memorise 100 shortcuts.

1. There are no nouns or verbs in Vim. There's a haphazardly built combination of letters that are laboriously explained as some grand design.

2. You keep coming up with random numbers that make no sense and pretend (yes, pretend) that they are somehow true and relevant

I didn't memorise 100 shortcuts.

The only reason you struggle to get the same functionality out of an IDE is that you don't want to invest as much time and energy into learning it as you did with emacs/vim. There's nothing inherently easier about memorising `M-x sql-connect` or 20 random letters in Vim than learning basic functionality and shortcuts of an IDE.

> 1. There are no nouns or verbs in Vim.

Yes, there is.

Since your entire argument is predicated on a false premise, maybe you should stop digging at this point?

I agree. Honestly, I’m proficient with vim/emacs, but I’ve been using JetBrains for ~13 years and don’t want to sound boastful, but I’m pretty sure I’ll run circles around non-trivial amount of vim users in terms of productivity/efficiency/raw text editing. The amount of time I’ve put in customizing my workflow is stupid. The false dichotomy that if you use IDE you must be point-clicking around menus is often repeated. I guess … know your tool of choice inside-out is what’s more important.

> > It just takes much less memory to remember 4 verbs and maybe 6 nouns in Vim to perform navigation, than learning 4x6=24 shortcuts

> Thing is, you don't remember "fewer things" with Emacs/Vim. You end up remembering about the same, or greater number of things on top of significantly worse functionality.

You don't understand vim yet you confidently state that it requires remembering more things. vim is like a language. You do not memorize entire English sentences when you choose to communicate with someone, it's the same in vim. You do not memorize how to do do something, but rather the grammar/verbs/nouns.

If you know that 'd' is the verb for deleting, and that 'w' is the motion for 'word', you can combine them into 'dw' to delete until the end of the word. When you later learn that '$' takes you to the end of the line, you know that you can do 'd$' to delete until the end of the line. You do not need to memorize 'd$' and 'dw' individually, just the motions and actions separately.

The same applies to actions, when you learn that y is yank (copy), you can apply the same 'w' and '$' motions in that cases to copy until the end of the word/line. That is what the poster means about verbs and nouns. Vim isn't discoverable, you cannot learn to use it without reading. But it is the most logically consistent "editing language" I have personally seen (alongside kakoune/helix).

You are also mixing up many concepts in your arguments. You can get LSP in vim/emacs and you can get vim-ish hotkeys in popular IDE's. The topic of this thread, Zed, is pretty vimmy and is closer to vs-code than it is to vim.

> If you know that 'd' ... and that 'w'

> When you later learn that '$'

> when you learn that y

As if that doesn't require you to remember things. In the end I always, without fail, see people consistently struggle with doing things in Vim that take a single shortcut (or an action lookup) in an IDE. Even people who've been working in Vim for years.

Because it's a nice little story about "oh, it's so easy to yank a word" because it's always easy to come up with the most trivial examples.

And this narrative about verbs and nouns falls apart even for trivial examples. E.g. the simple act of going to end of line, end of file, beginning of file are three different shortcuts that have little to no relation to each other. No worries, you just have to memorize them. Don't forget variations on shortcuts like yy and Y. And many other idiosyncrasies that don't fall neatly into the verb-noun narrative.

> Vim isn't discoverable, you cannot learn to use it without reading

Funny how the very same people who say this are hell bent on never learning IDEs.

> You can get LSP in vim/emacs

Yes, you can. There's a reason LSP never came out of emacs/vim world.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com