That's not true. Science communicators in the past have successfully taught complex theories to a wider audience without compromising in integrity and accuracy.
The issue here is that many youtubers have sold factual correctness for a view count.
The issue here is that many youtubers have sold factual correctness for a view count.
It’s such a common behavioural tendency with general audience publications that someone coined a law for it (the name of which I forget but I’m sure someone else on here can reply with it).