Why not? What's the thinking here?
> Probably not, Snowden is part of the Russian Spy and Disinformation campaign. He is basically a Russian agent.
Any evidence for that?
No. But it's reasonable to presume he's a compromised source. That doesn't mean he wants to be, nor that everything he's saying has been dictated to him. But his public communications would be, at the very least, monitored and vetted.
This is another way of trying to inflate an incident, to create "an elephant out of a fly"(as they say in Russia)
This has little to no relevance on freedom of speech
at this point he is at the mercy of his FSB handler, either he posts what he is told/expected to or he loses usefulness and joins Russell 'Texas' Bentley as a cautionary tale.