Hacker News Reader

> However, TikTok's decision to show the video to the child is TikTok's speech, and TikTok is liable for that decision.

How is my interpretation incorrect, please? TikTok (or any other website like Google) can show a video to a child in any number of ways - all of which could be considered to be their speech.

View on HN

The third sentence is "If the kid searched specifically for the video and found it, TikTok would have been safe."

Aah, I counted paragraphs - repeatedly - for some reason. That's my bad.

That said, this is a statement completely unsubstantiated in the original post or in the post that it links to, or the decision in TFA. It's the poster's opinion stated as if it were a fact or a part of the Judge's ruling.

You're right, I did jump to that conclusion. It turns out it was the correct conclusion, although I definitely shouldn't have said it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41394465

Reply on news.ycombinator.com