This is what I meant by odd equivocating. I made a clear point about Tim Pool and linked to a specific video. It is downright bizarre to ask the equivalent of “What if some other guy said something else entirely?” There is quite literally no room for misinterpretation unless it is forcibly introduced into conversation here.

This is the standard playbook of those trying to avoid any scrutiny into these industrial propaganda campaigns mounted by the likes of Russia and China: when faced with the evidence, they rush to try to muddy the waters with inane non-sequiturs on semantics, or other logical fallacies such as whataboutisms.

That's very clearly not what was said. Rather, they were referring specifically to content from Tim Pool.

I agree he comes off as uncontrolled and it is bizarre.

That's good to know. But here's the thing -- it doesn't matter that he may be right, or partially right on certain details (like Nordstream, for example).

Because as a whole -- it's still propaganda, just from how it's structured, and the pungently shrill, and yes, intentionally uncontrolled and bizarre tone he employs. And from all the deceptions and diversions that's it packed with, and which we very quickly key into once we stop to break it all down.

That's how propaganda works. It's kind of like a shit sandwich, we might say. Parts of it might be kind of tasty actually, and perhaps have some nutritive value. But as a whole, its nutritive value is entirely the opposite. And in fact can be quite toxic.

As is basically every piece of content you will find from Tim Pool and others of his mold.