Alienate the users on their machine, not something that can be hacked, studied and understood as a computer, instead a piece of magical wisdom.
Dumb down the mainstream user, and tie them up on their products.
"Protect" their software, being the computer just a black box projecting their knowledge / entertainment.
I hope DRM backfires really hard on the companies advocating for it.
> To perceive the computer as an appliance instead of a piece of hardware.
For many (most?) computers are appliances. Which does not contradict them being pieces of hardware. > Alienate the users on their machine, not something that can be hacked,
> studied and understood as a computer, instead a piece of magical wisdom.
What a load of bullshit. > Dumb down the mainstream user, and tie them up on their products.
It seems it is extremely hard to grasp the simple true: only minority of the population is interested in being hackers, programmers and IT guys. They just want to use computers — much the same way like they drive their cars without any wish and ambition to be a car mechanic.
It is not "dumbing down" — it is freeing them from caring "how do I make this fucking thing work" to just doing what they want to do: be it browsing Facebook, writing a research paper or calculating orbit to Mars.In my opinion secure boot just means that my computer is owned by the company that has certified it.
Being that the case, what does DRM and the secure boot feature in UEFI add to that experience?
Because I want a computer. I go to the store, I see a cheap one, and I pay for it. Then I go home and use it. I'm an end user that just wants to get to email, youtube, and Google. I don't know what secure boot is, what a BIOS or an EFI is, all I care is that I don't have to spend money.
I don't know it's crippled. I have no way of noticing. Hell, I'm still using Internet Explorer.